<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Free Wordpress Themes &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/category/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com</link>
	<description>Wordpress Theme Viewer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Safer Gmail With Https</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/a-safer-gmail-with-https/</link>
		<comments>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/a-safer-gmail-with-https/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-07-25-n17.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google added a new feature to Gmail to always use a secure (https) connection. Switch to the settings/ general tab and scroll down to "Browser connection" to see if you got it already (if not, it may still be rolled out for you). While safer, Google in their blog announcement of this also notes it may slow down your Gmail a bit. 
 
[Thanks Mrrix32!]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/a-safer-gmail-with-https/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Google Looks for the Colorblind</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/how-google-looks-for-the-colorblind/</link>
		<comments>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/how-google-looks-for-the-colorblind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-07-25-n47.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Colorblind Web Page Filter, above is what Google.com looks like for users with protanopia (red/ green color blindness). Perhaps Google should run this as their logo one day to raise 
awareness of color blindness. Out of interest, does that logo look normal to anyone here/ is there anyone who's colorblind here? 
 
The Colorblind Filter site is a bit slow at the moment but if you created a website and you're not color blind, you can check how well your intended color scheme fares. The site also has more information on how to select safer colors. 
 
[Via Paul Buchheit]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/how-google-looks-for-the-colorblind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Notice From The Bureau of Public Anomaly Screenings</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/a-notice-from-the-bureau-of-public-anomaly-screenings/</link>
		<comments>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/a-notice-from-the-bureau-of-public-anomaly-screenings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-07-25-n65.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Date: August 7, 2032 
From: The Bureau of Public Anomaly Screenings 
Subject: A notice 
 
Dear citizen, 
 
As you may know, under the Public Screening Act of 2030, all citizens are undergoing routine checks for anomalies. We do so through the use of public sources only, aggregating and mining your digital traces. 
 
According to our findings, which are accurate in 99.5% of all cases -- thus legally qualifying as proof beyond reasonable doubt -- we have come to the following conclusions: 
 
- Your 56 Amazon book reviews and ratings: The choice of books reviewed, as well as the reviews given, lead our system to believe you have an above average interest in anti-governmental subjects. The associated review timestamps sh ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/a-notice-from-the-bureau-of-public-anomaly-screenings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unicode Graphic Domains</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/unicode-graphic-domains/</link>
		<comments>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/unicode-graphic-domains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-07-24-n24.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Domains using the full character spectrum aren't really supported well in browsers, partly due to security issues... so entering something like bücherei.com (the German word for library) will resolve into what is called a punycode address, namely xn--bcherei-n2a.com. This kinda ruins it for serious uses, but still, there's domains out there using more than just ASCII letters... and some even use the graphical symbols part of Unicode: 
 
 
This one showing the female symbol is still under construction: www.♀.com 
The self-proclaimed "manliest domain on the internet" is for sale: www.♂.com 
A page load error for heart-dot-com: www.♥.com 
The  ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/unicode-graphic-domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chubby and the Paxos Algorithm</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/google-chubby-and-the-paxos-algorithm/</link>
		<comments>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/google-chubby-and-the-paxos-algorithm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-07-24-n69.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope, this is not the title of a children's book (though it would be great as that!). Quote Google: 
 
Chubby is a fault-tolerant system at Google that provides a distributed locking mechanism and stores small files. Typically there is one Chubby instance, or "cell", per data center. Several Google systems -- such as the Google Filesystem (GFS) and Bigtable -- use Chubby for distributed coordination and to store a small amount of metadata. 
 
Chubby achieves fault-tolerance through replication. A typical Chubby cell consists of five replicas, running the same code, each running on a dedicated machine. Every Chubby object (e.g., a Chubby lock, or file) is stored as an entry in a database. It is this database that is replicated. At any one time, one of these replicas is considered to be the "master". 
 
 ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/google-chubby-and-the-paxos-algorithm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can You Guess What This Cartoon Is?</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/can-you-guess-what-this-cartoon-is/</link>
		<comments>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/can-you-guess-what-this-cartoon-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-07-24-n34.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



 [By Philipp Lenssen &#124; Origin: Can You Guess What This Cartoon Is? &#124; Comments][Advertisement] Find the right keywords for your campaigns at KeywordDiscovery.com  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/can-you-guess-what-this-cartoon-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Knol&#8217;s Nofollowing Of Links</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/knols-nofollowing-of-links/</link>
		<comments>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/knols-nofollowing-of-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-07-24-n22.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Knol is a publishing tool but unlike some other such tools by Google, this time all your article's outgoing links will be "nofollowed." The nofollow attribute is a mechanism to disable the juice a link is sending to another site. So while you can link to Knol pages to give them more authority in the eyes of Googlebot and others, Knol pages do not pass this authority measure back to other sites. 
 
In a Knol article, at first glance, you won't see the nofollow attribute if you look for it in links. There's also nothing in the robots.txt which would prevent spidering of Knol content, and in fact, filling knowledge gaps in Google results was one of the proclaimed main aims for Google to build Knol. But you will see the following meta directive o ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/knols-nofollowing-of-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finding Cartoons to Use in Google Knol</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/finding-cartoons-to-use-in-google-knol/</link>
		<comments>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/finding-cartoons-to-use-in-google-knol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-07-24-n10.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google's new publishing platform Knol has an interesting feature to offer: authors are allowed to use one cartoon from The New Yorker magazine per article*. The New Yorker started in the mid-1920s and collectively there's lots of cartoon content. I'm not sure where Google's partnership with the magazine puts republications of articles using the Creative Commons license (as the republication would include the cartoon) or Google's blanket permission to use screenshots of their sites (as screenshots may include a cartoon too).** Also, I wonder if some people will create a short wrapper Knol article whenever they want to freely republish a New Yorker cartoon. 
 
Now how would you go about ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/finding-cartoons-to-use-in-google-knol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Account Phishing Attempt Using Orkut</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/google-account-phishing-attempt-using-orkut/</link>
		<comments>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/google-account-phishing-attempt-using-orkut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-07-24-n43.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, I received a greetings card from someone called Shelia who was using "Orkut Greetings" (supposedly a service offered by Orkut, Google's social network). Or at least that's what the sender of this email wanted me to believe: 
 
 
 
Those extra details are usually hidden by default, but I expanded them to verify that the email genuinely came from Google. It appears to have been sent from an Orkut email address and was even signed by the google.com domain. Seems genuine so far? Take a look at the domain in the link: 
 
http://orkult.greetingslogin.googlepages.com 
 
As you can see, the email isn't sending me to Orkut at all. It's actually sending me to a page hosted on]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/google-account-phishing-attempt-using-orkut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Knol Is Live</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/google-knol-is-live/</link>
		<comments>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/google-knol-is-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-07-23-n20.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google went live with Knol, a platform to read and write articles on all kinds of subject. Knol was being tested privately since some time and had been pre-announced back in 2007. The address is knol.google.com, but notably not knol.com or knol.org or even googleknol.com. This project is somewhat reminiscent of Wikipedia, though there are many differences as well.  You may also think of this as an alternative to creating a small info website if your aim is to cover only a single subject. 
 
When you log-in within your Google account to write an article on a subject you're familiar with, you ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wordpress.tareeinternet.com/google-knol-is-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

